Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Jacobsen, CR 15-0518 MMC. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180914d76 Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER UNDER F.R.C.P. RULE 36 TO ISSUE AMENDED JUDGMENT THAT INCLUDES FORFEITURE OF 54' HYLAS YACHT AS ORDERED AT SENTENCING MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . On June 26, 2018, the Court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture forfeiting to the United States the following asset, subject to third party claim procedures outlined in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2: • one 54' Hylas sailboat, bearing the names "Swept Away," "Alcyone," or "B'ANN," wit
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER UNDER F.R.C.P. RULE 36 TO ISSUE AMENDED JUDGMENT THAT INCLUDES FORFEITURE OF 54' HYLAS YACHT AS ORDERED AT SENTENCING

On June 26, 2018, the Court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture forfeiting to the United States the following asset, subject to third party claim procedures outlined in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2:

• one 54' Hylas sailboat, bearing the names "Swept Away," "Alcyone," or "B'ANN," with Hull Identification Number HSY54037J405, and Official Number 1166171, located and seized by agents at a marina in Beaufort, North Carolina, on November 18, 2015.

Dkt. 167.

The order followed and resulted from the defendant Robert Jacobsen's guilty pleas and his admissions and agreements in his plea agreement. Dkt. 135, 136.

On September 4, 2018, the Court sentenced the defendant. Dkt. 182. At the sentencing hearing, the Court orally announced its order of forfeiture of the above described 54' Hylas sailboat.

On September 6, 2018, Judgment was entered on the docket. Dkt. 183. The Judgment did not reflect the Court's order of forfeiture of the 54' Hylas sailboat.

F.R.Crim.P. Rule 32.2(b)(4)(B) provides that the Court's forfeiture order be orally announced at sentencing (or otherwise to notify the defendant) and that the Court "include the forfeiture order, directly or by reference, in the judgment, but the court's failure to so may be corrected at any time under Rule 36."

F.R.Crim.P. Rule 36 provides, "After giving any notice it considers appropriate, the court may at any time correct a clerical error in a judgment, order, or other part of the record, or correct an error in the record arising from oversight or omission."

The parties hereby stipulate that the omission of the Court's forfeiture order from the Judgment meets the definition of a clerical error and an error in the record arising from an oversight and omission under F.R.Crim.P. Rule 36, and the parties respectfully request that the Court order an Amended Judgment be issued that includes its order at the sentencing hearing of forfeiture of the above-described 54' Hylas sailboat.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer