MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
On June 26, 2018, the Court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture forfeiting to the United States the following asset, subject to third party claim procedures outlined in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2:
Dkt. 167.
The order followed and resulted from the defendant Robert Jacobsen's guilty pleas and his admissions and agreements in his plea agreement. Dkt. 135, 136.
On September 4, 2018, the Court sentenced the defendant. Dkt. 182. At the sentencing hearing, the Court orally announced its order of forfeiture of the above described 54' Hylas sailboat.
On September 6, 2018, Judgment was entered on the docket. Dkt. 183. The Judgment did not reflect the Court's order of forfeiture of the 54' Hylas sailboat.
F.R.Crim.P. Rule 32.2(b)(4)(B) provides that the Court's forfeiture order be orally announced at sentencing (or otherwise to notify the defendant) and that the Court "include the forfeiture order, directly or by reference, in the judgment, but the court's failure to so may be corrected at any time under Rule 36."
F.R.Crim.P. Rule 36 provides, "After giving any notice it considers appropriate, the court may at any time correct a clerical error in a judgment, order, or other part of the record, or correct an error in the record arising from oversight or omission."
The parties hereby stipulate that the omission of the Court's forfeiture order from the Judgment meets the definition of a clerical error and an error in the record arising from an oversight and omission under F.R.Crim.P. Rule 36, and the parties respectfully request that the Court order an Amended Judgment be issued that includes its order at the sentencing hearing of forfeiture of the above-described 54' Hylas sailboat.