MAXWELL/G-DOFFEE v. GOLDEN, 5:09CV00379 JLH-JTK. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20130909439
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 06, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 06, 2013
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge. The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for hearing and relief, which the Court construes as a motion for preliminary injuncti
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge. The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for hearing and relief, which the Court construes as a motion for preliminary injunctiv..
More
ORDER
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for hearing and relief, which the Court construes as a motion for preliminary injunctive relief, is DENIED. Document #253.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
