ROBERTS v. HOBBS, 5:14CV00054 BSM. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150528823
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 27, 2015
Latest Update: May 27, 2015
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray has been received, along with plaintiff's objections and request to voluntarily dismiss his case. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' moti
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray has been received, along with plaintiff's objections and request to voluntarily dismiss his case. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendants' motio..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray has been received, along with plaintiff's objections and request to voluntarily dismiss his case. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 47] is granted, and the case is dismissed with prejudice.
2. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 67] is denied.
3. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.
Source: Leagle
