Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HARRIS v. HOBBS, 5:13-cv-000090 KGB/BD. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20130610826 Visitors: 31
Filed: Jun. 07, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2013
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition file by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere (Dkt. No. 8); has considered petitioner Lee Mark Harris's objections to the Recommended Disposition (Dkt. No. 9); and has reviewed de novo those portions of the Recommended Disposition to which Mr. Harris objects. After careful consideration, this Court adopts the Recommended Disposition as its own. Mr. Harris's petition for writ of habeas corpus is h
More

ORDER

KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.

The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition file by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere (Dkt. No. 8); has considered petitioner Lee Mark Harris's objections to the Recommended Disposition (Dkt. No. 9); and has reviewed de novo those portions of the Recommended Disposition to which Mr. Harris objects. After careful consideration, this Court adopts the Recommended Disposition as its own. Mr. Harris's petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby dismissed with prejudice (Dkt. No. 2).

When entering a final order adverse to a habeas corpus petitioner, the Court must issue or deny a certificate of appealability. Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. A certificate of appealability may issue only if a petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). In this case, there is no basis for this Court to issue a certificate of appealability. Accordingly, a certificate of appealability is denied.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer