Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cairney v. Berryhill, 2:16-cv-02139-APG-CWH. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170421h93 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 19, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION FOR AWARD OF EAJA FEES CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the approval of the Court as provided below, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. 2412(d), in the amount of six thousand dollars ($6,000.00), and costs in the amount of four hundred dollars ($400) under 28 U.S.C. 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal servi
More

STIPULATION FOR AWARD OF EAJA FEES

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, and with the approval of the Court as provided below, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of six thousand dollars ($6,000.00), and costs in the amount of four hundred dollars ($400) under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920, 2412(d).

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (U.S. June 14, 2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees and costs shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees and costs to be made directly to plaintiff's counsel Charles E. Binder, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel Charles E. Binder.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees connection with this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer