Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CITY OF SAN JOSE v. OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER OF BASEBALL, CV 13-02787 RMW. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130808709 Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 07, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. Plaintiffs City of San Jose, City of San Jose as successor agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jose, and the San Jose Diridon Development Authority ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants the Office of the Commissioner of Baseball and Allan H. Selig ("Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties"), through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as fol
More

STIPULATION AND [] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs City of San Jose, City of San Jose as successor agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jose, and the San Jose Diridon Development Authority ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants the Office of the Commissioner of Baseball and Allan H. Selig ("Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties"), through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on July 22, 2013, the clerk for the Honorable Ronald M. Whyte issued a Notice of Setting Case Management Conference, setting a case management conference at 10:30 A.M. on September 20, 2013, as well as a September 13, 2013 deadline for the filing of a Case Management Statement;

WHEREAS, pursuant to a Stipulation re Service and Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint filed on July 10, 2013, Defendants' response to Plaintiffs' Complaint is due on August 7, 2013;

WHEREAS, Defendants intend to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint by filing a Motion to Dismiss and request a hearing date of October 4, 2013; and

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that it would be most efficient for the Case Management Conference to occur concurrently with the hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between the Parties that the following schedule be set:

1. The deadline for Plaintiffs to file an opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is September 6, 2013; 2. The deadline for Defendants to file a reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss is September 20, 2013; 3. The Motion to Dismiss is to be heard by the Court on October 4, 2013; 4. The initial Case Management Conference is continued until October 4, 2013; and 5. The deadline to file a Case Management Statement is continued until September 27, 2013.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer