Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Williams v. County of San Diego, 17-cv-00815-MMA (JLB). (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20191120b10 Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO'S DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET THREE, TO PLAINTIFFS KATY WILLIAMS, A.C., AM.E. AND AA.E. [ECF No. 150] JILL L. BURKHARDT , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is a joint motion for an order regarding Defendant County of San Diego's demand for production of documents, Set Three, to Plaintiffs Katy Williams, A.C., Am.E., and Aa.E. (ECF No. 150.) Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the joint motion a
More

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO'S DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET THREE, TO PLAINTIFFS KATY WILLIAMS, A.C., AM.E. AND AA.E.

[ECF No. 150]

Before the Court is a joint motion for an order regarding Defendant County of San Diego's demand for production of documents, Set Three, to Plaintiffs Katy Williams, A.C., Am.E., and Aa.E. (ECF No. 150.) Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the joint motion and issues the following Order:

1. Plaintiffs shall provide amended responses to Defendant's Demand for Production of Documents, Set Three, directly to the Court within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order for in camera review. If Plaintiffs do not have such records in their possession, they shall serve the applicable mental health providers with HIPAA-compliant authorizations within five (5) days of the date of this Order directing the providers to produce such records to the Court for in camera review. The purpose of the Court's in camera review of these records is as set forth in the May 31, 2019 Order (ECF No. 98), to determine whether the records are proportional to the needs of the case.

2. All records and information produced in response to Defendant's Demand for Production of Documents, Set Three, whether from Plaintiffs or as a result of HIPAA-compliant authorizations signed by Plaintiffs, shall be covered by the November 7, 2019 Protective Order (ECF No. 146).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer