Williams v. Romero, 2:17-cv-1884 TLN DB P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190515c90
Visitors: 35
Filed: May 14, 2019
Latest Update: May 14, 2019
Summary: ORDER DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff alleges excessive force and deliberate indifference to his medical needs when he was trapped by a mechanical sliding door. On March 29, 2019, plaintiff filed a request for the issuance of subpoenas. (ECF No. 53.) The court denied that request. (ECF No. 54.) In that April 12 order, the court construed plaintiff's request for a subpoena to inspect the site
Summary: ORDER DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Plaintiff alleges excessive force and deliberate indifference to his medical needs when he was trapped by a mechanical sliding door. On March 29, 2019, plaintiff filed a request for the issuance of subpoenas. (ECF No. 53.) The court denied that request. (ECF No. 54.) In that April 12 order, the court construed plaintiff's request for a subpoena to inspect the site ..
More
ORDER
DEBORAH BARNES, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges excessive force and deliberate indifference to his medical needs when he was trapped by a mechanical sliding door. On March 29, 2019, plaintiff filed a request for the issuance of subpoenas. (ECF No. 53.) The court denied that request. (ECF No. 54.) In that April 12 order, the court construed plaintiff's request for a subpoena to inspect the site at issue as a request that plaintiff himself be permitted to inspect the site. (Id. at 2.)
On April 26, plaintiff filed a document in which he explains that he intends to have a third party perform an inspection of the site. (ECF No. 56.) The court construes plaintiff's filing as a renewed motion for a subpoena to inspect premises.
Within twenty days of the date of this order, defendants shall file a response to plaintiff's April 26 filing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
