Jones v. Cabiladas, CV17-8802 CAS (PLA). (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20200228d37
Visitors: 26
Filed: Feb. 26, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2020
Summary: ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii)) CHRISTINA A. SNYDER , Senior District Judge . Based on the Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal entered into by and between Plaintiff and Defendants ("the Stipulation") and for good cause shown: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Stipulation is approved; 2. Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose,
Summary: ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii)) CHRISTINA A. SNYDER , Senior District Judge . Based on the Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal entered into by and between Plaintiff and Defendants ("the Stipulation") and for good cause shown: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Stipulation is approved; 2. Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 1..
More
ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii))
CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, Senior District Judge.
Based on the Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal entered into by and between Plaintiff and Defendants ("the Stipulation") and for good cause shown:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Stipulation is approved;
2. Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear their own attorney's fees and costs. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.
Dated: February 26, 2020 ________________________________________
Hon. Paul L. Abrams
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
