Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

IN RE MYFORD TOUCH CONSUMER LITIGATION, 3:13-CV-3072-EMC. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160204934 Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 03, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 03, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PR OPOS ED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFICATION TO DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE DECLARATION REGARDING MOTION TO SEAL CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEF [N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-11] EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiffs will file their motion for class certification and memorandum of law in support thereof on Thursday, January 28, 2016; WHEREAS, this Court, pursuant to stipulation, extended the page limit for that memorandum of law to fifty pages ( see ECF No. 192); WHEREAS,
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING MODIFICATION TO DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE DECLARATION REGARDING MOTION TO SEAL CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEF

[N.D. CAL. L.R. 7-11]

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs will file their motion for class certification and memorandum of law in support thereof on Thursday, January 28, 2016;

WHEREAS, this Court, pursuant to stipulation, extended the page limit for that memorandum of law to fifty pages (see ECF No. 192);

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have stated their intent to cite numerous documents in their class certification papers that have been designated by Ford as Protected Documents pursuant to the protective order entered in this case (ECF No. 96), or will make assertions that are derived from such Protective Documents;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Protective Order and Local Rule 79-5, Plaintiffs shall file their papers as partially redacted so as not to disclose the contents of the Protected Documents, and will file a motion to seal the redacted information;

WHEREAS, Ford is required to file a responsive declaration supporting the sealing of the Protected Documents or information derived therefrom in Plaintiffs' papers within four days after they are filed (see ECF No. 96 at 6);

WHEREAS, two of the four days provided for Ford to file the responsive declaration supporting the sealing of the Protected Documents coincide with a weekend;

WHEREAS, Local Rule 7-11 permits a party to seek miscellaneous administrative relief pursuant to a stipulation by the parties;

WHEREAS, the deadline extension stipulated to by Ford and Plaintiffs will require no change to the dates set for trial of the matter;

WHEREAS, execution of this Stipulation is not a waiver of any claims or defenses Plaintiffs or Ford otherwise may have;

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiffs and Ford, through their counsel of record, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

1. The deadline for Ford to file a responsive declaration to establish that certain material in Plaintiffs' class certification papers is sealable is extended to February 5, 2016.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer