Filed: Oct. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF SENTENCING AND RESETTING PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT SCHEDULE; [PROPOSED] ORDER GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. , Senior District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for sentencing on November 2, 2018. 2. By this stipulation, the parties now move to continue sentencin
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF SENTENCING AND RESETTING PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT SCHEDULE; [PROPOSED] ORDER GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. , Senior District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for sentencing on November 2, 2018. 2. By this stipulation, the parties now move to continue sentencing..
More
STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF SENTENCING AND RESETTING PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT SCHEDULE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR., Senior District Judge.
STIPULATION
Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. By previous order, this matter was set for sentencing on November 2, 2018.
2. By this stipulation, the parties now move to continue sentencing until January 4, 2019, and to reset the schedule for disclosure of the pre-sentence report and objections thereto, as follows:
a) Judgment and Sentencing Date: January 4, 2019
b) Reply or Statement of No Opposition: December 28, 2018
c) Motion for Correction of the Pre-Sentence Report: December 21, 2018
d) Final Presentence Report Filed with the Court and Parties: December 14, 2018
e) Counsel's Written Objections to the Pre-Sentence Report Delivered to Probation Officer and Opposing Counsel: December 7, 2018
f) The proposed pre-sentence report will be considered already shared with the parties as ECF No. 191.
3. The parties agree that in light of the procedural history of this case, counsel for the defendant should have the opportunity to engage fully in the presentence investigation report process, given that she was not counsel at the time the presentence report was drafted and finalized initially.
4. The government will oppose any further efforts to continue sentencing in this matter.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
