JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT

WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.

Counsel for Plaintiff Richtek Technology Corporation and counsel for Defendant uPI Semiconductor Corporation hereby submit this stipulation and proposed order.

1. The parties earlier today signed and executed a written settlement agreement. Under the settlement, a contingency must be satisfied within 3 business days of the agreement's execution, and then the case will be dismissed promptly thereafter. Accordingly, per the agreement, the case will be dismissed in advance of the Pretrial Conference set for November 30th at 2:00 p.m. (and very likely next week).

2. The parties promptly notified the Court of this earlier today be joint letter (Dkt. No. 581), as provided for in paragraph 37 of the Court's January 11, 2016 Guidelines for Trial and Pretrial Conference in Civil Jury Cases, and pursuant to the Court's instructions at yesterday's summary judgment hearing.

3. The parties followed up today by contacting Chambers and was advised to file a written pleading, which parties are now presenting in the form of this stipulation and proposed order.

Now therefore, given the signed settlement and forthcoming dismissal, to avoid unnecessary work, the parties stipulate and respectfully request that the Court enter an order continuing all upcoming deadlines and events, taking them off calendar, including the deadlines set in connection with next Wednesday's (11/23/16) extensive pretrial filings.

Filer's Attestation

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all parties.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.