Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Dasenbrook v. Enenmoh, 1:11-cv-01884 DAD DLB PC. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160512683 Visitors: 16
Filed: May 11, 2016
Latest Update: May 11, 2016
Summary: ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR SUBPOENAS FOR DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE [ECF No. 173] SANDRA M. SNYDER , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Robin Dasenbrook ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendants Enenmoh, Page, Perez, and Adair for claims of negligence and deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
More

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR SUBPOENAS FOR DEPOSITION BY WRITTEN QUESTIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE [ECF No. 173]

Plaintiff Robin Dasenbrook ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendants Enenmoh, Page, Perez, and Adair for claims of negligence and deliberate indifference to a serious medical need in violation of the Eighth Amendment.

On April 21, 2016, Plaintiff submitted a request to the Clerk of Court for subpoenas in order to serve four unidentified non-party witnesses with depositions by written questions. A deposition by written questions must be conducted in compliance with Rule 31 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Depositions by written questions entail more than mailing questions to the deponents and awaiting their written responses. The Court will direct the Clerk's Office to send Plaintiff a copy of Rule 31. If, after reviewing the rule, Plaintiff believes he is able to depose the four witnesses in compliance with the rule, Plaintiff shall notify the Court within thirty days and make a showing, under penalty of perjury, that he is able and willing to retain and compensate an officer to take responses and prepare the record. Fed. R. Civ. P. 31(b). At that juncture, the Court will determine what course of action is needed to facilitate the deposition.

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk's Office shall send Plaintiff a copy of Rule 31 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;

2. Plaintiff's motion for subpoenas to depose nonparty witnesses by written questions is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Rule 31. Depositions by Written Questions

(a) WHEN A DEPOSITION MAY BE TAKEN.

(1) Without Leave. A party may, by written questions, depose any person, including a party, without leave of court except as provided in Rule 31(a)(2). The deponent's attendance may be compelled by subpoena under Rule 45. (2) With Leave. A party must obtain leave of court, and the court must grant leave to the extent consistent with Rule 26(b)(1) and (2): (A) if the parties have not stipulated to the deposition and: (i) the deposition would result in more than 10 depositions being taken under this rule or Rule 30 by the plaintiffs, or by the defendants, or by the third-party defendants; (ii) the deponent has already been deposed in the case; or (iii) the party seeks to take a deposition before the time specified in Rule 26(d); or (B) if the deponent is confined in prison. (3) Service; Required Notice. A party who wants to depose a person by written questions must serve them on every other party, with a notice stating, if known, the deponent's name and address. If the name is unknown, the notice must provide a general description sufficient to identify the person or the particular class or group to which the person belongs. The notice must also state the name or descriptive title and the address of the officer before whom the deposition will be taken. (4) Questions Directed to an Organization. A public or private corporation, a partnership, an association, or a governmental agency may be deposed by written questions in accordance with Rule 30(b)(6). (5) Questions from Other Parties. Any questions to the deponent from other parties must be served on all parties as follows: cross-questions, within 14 days after being served with the notice and direct questions; redirect questions, within 7 days after being served with cross-questions; and recross-questions, within 7 days after being served with redirect questions. The court may, for good cause, extend or shorten these times.

(b) DELIVERY TO THE OFFICER; OFFICER'S DUTIES. The party who noticed the deposition must deliver to the officer a copy of all the questions served and of the notice. The officer must promptly proceed in the manner provided in Rule 30(c), (e), and (f) to:

(1) take the deponent's testimony in response to the questions; (2) prepare and certify the deposition; and (3) send it to the party, attaching a copy of the questions and of the notice.

(c) NOTICE OF COMPLETION OR FILING.

(1) Completion. The party who noticed the deposition must notify all other parties when it is completed. (2) Filing. A party who files the deposition must promptly notify all other parties of the filing.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer