Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Morales v. Brown, 1:14-cv-01717-LJO-SAB. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190717943 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE PROVE OF SERVICE OF SUGGESTION OF DEATH OF PLAINTIFF (ECF No. 55). FIVE-DAY DEADLINE STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Miguel Angel Morales ("Plaintiff") filed this action on November 1, 2014. (ECF No. 1.) The matter was stayed until the resolution of the appeals in the related cases of Smith, et al. v. Schwarzenegger, et al., appeal no. 15-17155, Hines v. Youssef, appeal no. 15-16145, and Jackson, et al. v. Brown, et al., appeal no. 15-17076.
More

ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE PROVE OF SERVICE OF SUGGESTION OF DEATH OF PLAINTIFF

(ECF No. 55).

FIVE-DAY DEADLINE

Miguel Angel Morales ("Plaintiff") filed this action on November 1, 2014. (ECF No. 1.) The matter was stayed until the resolution of the appeals in the related cases of Smith, et al. v. Schwarzenegger, et al., appeal no. 15-17155, Hines v. Youssef, appeal no. 15-16145, and Jackson, et al. v. Brown, et al., appeal no. 15-17076. (ECF No. 51.) On February 1, 2019, the Ninth Circuit issued an order affirming the district court decision in Smith, et al. v. Schwarzenegger, et al., appeal no. 15-17155, and Hines v. Youssef, appeal no. 15-16145, and affirming in part and reversing in part in Jackson, et al. v. Brown, et al., appeal no. 15-17076. The stay of this matter was lifted on April 5, 2019. (ECF No. 53.) On April 26, 2019, Defendants Hedgpeth and Schwarzenegger filed a motion to dismiss and a statement noting the death of Plaintiff. (ECF No. 54, 55.)

Rule 25(a)(1) provides for the dismissal of a party or an action if a motion for substitution is not made within ninety days after service of a statement noting the party's death. Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). In order for the ninety-day period for substitution to be triggered, a party must formally suggest the death of the party upon the record, Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1), and must serve other parties and nonparty successors or representatives of the deceased with a suggestion of death in the same manner as required for service of the motion to substitute, Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(3). Thus, a party may be served with the suggestion of death by service on his or her attorney, Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b), while non-party successors or representatives of the deceased party must be served the suggestion of death in the manner provided by Rule 4 for the service of a summons. Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(3); Barlow v. Ground, 39 F.3d 231, 232-34 (9th Cir. 1994). Rule 25 requires dismissal absent a motion for substitution within the ninety-day period only if the statement of death was properly served. Unicorn Tales, Inc., v. Bannerjee, 138 F.3d 467, 469-471 (2d Cir. 1998).

While Plaintiff's attorney has been served the suggestion of death, Defendants have not filed a proof of service for the non-party successors of representatives of Plaintiff. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within five (5) days of the entry of this order, Defendants shall file proof that the non-party successors or representatives of Plaintiff have been served with the suggestion of death.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer