Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

USA v. Kesoyan, 2:15-CR-00236-GEB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20171218709 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 15, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING EARLY PRODUCTION OF GRAND JURY TESTIMONY GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. , Senior District Judge . STIPULATION The United States, through Assistant United States Attorneys Nirav K. Desai and Jeremy J. Kelley, and defendant Nelli Kesoyan, through her counsel Alan J. Donato, hereby stipulate to the following: 1. This matter is currently set for trial before this Court on January 23, 2018. 2. To the extent that any of the witnesses who the United States wil
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING EARLY PRODUCTION OF GRAND JURY TESTIMONY

STIPULATION

The United States, through Assistant United States Attorneys Nirav K. Desai and Jeremy J. Kelley, and defendant Nelli Kesoyan, through her counsel Alan J. Donato, hereby stipulate to the following:

1. This matter is currently set for trial before this Court on January 23, 2018.

2. To the extent that any of the witnesses who the United States will call in its case-in-chief have previously testified before the Grand Jury regarding the subject-matter of their testimony, the transcripts of their testimony would fall within the provisions of the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500, et seq.

3. In order to facilitate the efficient presentation of evidence by both parties, the parties believe it is in the interests of justice to permit early disclosure of any Grand Jury testimony subject to the Jencks Act.

4. Accordingly, the parties hereby agree that pursuant to Rule 6(e)(3)(E)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and upon order of the Court, a proposed version of which is attached, the United States shall be permitted to produce to counsel for the defendant a copy of any Grand Jury testimony of any witness that the United States intends to call as a witness in its case-in-chief.

5. The parties further agree and stipulate that any such Grand Jury transcripts produced by the United States shall be used only with respect to the above-captioned criminal trial, and counsel for the defendant shall not disclosure or provide copies of such transcripts, or summaries of their contents, to any individuals other than the defendant or any individuals that counsel has retained for the defense in this case. Nothing in this provision limits the ability of counsel to use the transcripts, or portions thereof, in official proceedings before this Court, including trial

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the parties' Stipulation for Early Production of Grand Jury Testimony. For the reasons stated in the Stipulation, and for good cause appearing, the Court HEREBY ORDERS THAT, pursuant to Rule 6(e)(3)(E)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States is permitted to produce to the defendants copies of the transcripts of any Grand Jury testimony by any witness the United States presently intends to call as a witness at trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer