Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Bonnett, 2:13-CR-00210-JAM. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160307456 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 04, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING DEFENSE EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL MEDIA CONTAINING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . The United States of America, through its counsel Matthew Morris Assistant United States Attorney, and defendant, Daniel Bonnett, through his counsel, Kresta Nora Daly, stipulate to the issuance of the attached [Proposed] Protective Order which would permit a defense expert to inspect and analyze the contents of the hard drive and atten
More

STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING DEFENSE EXAMINATION AND ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL MEDIA CONTAINING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY

The United States of America, through its counsel Matthew Morris Assistant United States Attorney, and defendant, Daniel Bonnett, through his counsel, Kresta Nora Daly, stipulate to the issuance of the attached [Proposed] Protective Order which would permit a defense expert to inspect and analyze the contents of the hard drive and attendant storage media connected with the computer seized from Mr. Bonnett pursuant to a search warrant on February 14, 2013.

Mr. Bonnett's computers and hard drive were seized by Special Agent Ryan Vazquez of the Department of Homeland Security. The computers are in the custody of the Department of Homeland Security. The government contends that the computer hard drives and/or attendant storage media contain specific images of child pornography. Marcus Lawson is the President of Global CompuSearch, LLP and an expert in the investigation of digital evidence. To assist in the investigation of the case and pursuant to the Court's authorization, counsel for Mr. Bonnett have retained the services of Mr. Lawson and Global CompuSearch to examine and analyze the digital information contained on the hard drive and attendant storage media of Mr. Bonnett's computers. To facilitate that examination it will be necessary for the government to create a duplicate copy of the hard drive and provide a private location in which Mr. Lawson, or one of the other experts employed by Global CompuSearch, can conduct the examination.

Therefore, the government and Mr. Bonnett stipulate to the issuance of the [Proposed] Protective Order.

Respectfully submitted, Dated: March 2, 2016 By/s/ Kresta Nora Daly for MATTHEW MORRIS Assistant United States Attorney

PROTECTIVE ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING upon the stipulation of the parties it is ordered:

1. The United States Department of Homeland Security shall make a duplicate copy of the hard drive and any attendant storage media of the computer seized on February 14, 2013, from Daniel Bonnett by SA Ryan Vazquez.

2. The duplicate copies of the hard drive and storage media shall be made available to Marcus Lawson, or another computer forensic expert employed by Global CompuSearch, for the purpose of conducting an examination and analysis of digital evidence to assist counsel in the defense of Mr. Bonnett. The images on the hard drive and storage media shall not be viewed by any other person unless defense counsel is present and the viewing is necessary to prepare for defendant's defense.

3. The digital evidence may be viewed only at the offices of the Department of Homeland Security by defense counsel, Matthew Morris, Marcus Lawson, or another computer forensic expert employed by Global CompuSearch.

4. A private location will be provided for the defense examination of the duplicate hard drive and/or any attendant storage media;

5. The expert will be permitted to bring whatever equipment, books or records, he or she believes necessary to conduct the examination.

6. Neither the defense expert nor defense attorney shall remove the hard drive or other storage media from the offices of the Department of Homeland Security.

7. With the exception of materials which would be considered child pornography under federal law (including visual images and data capable of conversion into a visual image), the expert may download and remove files or portions of files, provided the forensic integrity of the hard drive is not altered.

8. When the examination of the duplicate hard drive and/or any attendant storage media is completed the expert shall certify in writing, using the attached certification, that he or she has taken no materials which would be considered child pornography under federal law and that he or she has not caused any child pornography to be sent off site.

9. Except when a defense expert or attorney fails to provide this certification, no Government official or any person connected with the Government, will examine or acquire in any fashion any of the items used by the expert in order to conduct the defense analyses.

10. However, should a defense expert fail to certify that the items to be taken off site do not contain child pornography, Government officials may then inspect or examine the materials in order to ensure that prohibited child pornography has not been removed.

11. When the defense indicates that it is finished with its review of the copy of the hard drives, said drives shall be "wiped" clean and promptly returned to defendant's proposed expert who originally provided the drives for the purpose of this examination.

12. Any disputes regarding the above or problems implementing this order shall be brought to the attention of the Court through representative counsel after first consulting opposing counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer