Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Zizumbo v. Unilever United States, Inc., 3:18-cv-07213-JSW. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20181221e09 Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE MOTION TO STRIKE CLASS ALLEGATIONS AS MODIFIED JEFFREY S. WHITE , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(b), Plaintiffs Jennifer Zizumbo, Chandra Zundel, and Adrianne Ordaz ("Plaintiffs"), on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and Defendant Unilever United States, Inc. ("Unilever"), through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follo
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE MOTION TO STRIKE CLASS ALLEGATIONS AS MODIFIED

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(b), Plaintiffs Jennifer Zizumbo, Chandra Zundel, and Adrianne Ordaz ("Plaintiffs"), on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and Defendant Unilever United States, Inc. ("Unilever"), through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS on December 4, 2018, the parties entered a stipulation, whereby Unilever would file its responsive pleadings to the complaint by December 17, 2018 and Plaintiffs would file their opposition by January 4, 2019 (ECF No. 9);

WHEREAS Unilever filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint and Motion to Strike Class Allegations and a Request for Judicial Notice on December 17, 2018 (ECF Nos. 15-17), and noticed the hearing for March 22, 2019, the earliest date on which both this Court and Unilever's counsel would be available;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' counsel desires additional time to complete their opposition brief due to the holidays;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Plaintiffs' time to respond to the Motion to Dismiss the Complaint and Motion to Strike Class Allegations and Request for Judicial Notice shall be extended from January 4, 2019 to January 11, 2019, and Defendants' reply shall be due on January 25, 2019;

WHEREAS the extension will not alter the date of the hearing or deadline;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties, through their counsel, that pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiffs' time to respond to Unilever's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint and Motion to Strike Class Allegations and Request for Judicial Notice shall be extended from January 4, 2019 to January 11, 2019, and Defendants' reply shall be due on January 25, 2019.

PROPOSED ORDER

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(b), and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, it is therefore ORDERED that:

Plaintiffs' time to respond to Unilever's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint and Motion to Strike Class Allegations and Request for Judicial Notice shall be extended from January 4, 2019 to January 11, 2019, and Defendants' reply shall be due on January 25, 2019. The hearing shall be set, May 3, 2019 at 9:00.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ATTESTATION OF COMPLIANCE

I, Kristen Simplicio, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this document. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Claudia M. Vetesi concurred in this filing.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer