Filed: Jul. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1920 ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . TO THE HONORABLE ALLISON CLAIRE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Daniel Edward James be awarded attorney fees in the amount of
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1920 ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . TO THE HONORABLE ALLISON CLAIRE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Daniel Edward James be awarded attorney fees in the amount of t..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
TO THE HONORABLE ALLISON CLAIRE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Daniel Edward James be awarded attorney fees in the amount of three-thousand, five-hundred dollars ($3,500.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d).
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Daniel Edward James, the government will consider the matter of Daniel Edward James's assignment of EAJA fees to Laura E. Krank. The retainer agreement containing the assignment is attached as exhibit 1. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.
Fees shall be made payable to Daniel Edward James, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Daniel Edward James does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Law Offices of Rohlfing & Kalagian, LLP, pursuant to the assignment executed by Daniel Edward James.1 Any payments made shall be delivered to Laura E. Krank.
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Daniel Edward James's request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Daniel Edward James and/or Laura E. Krank including Law Offices of Rohlfing & Kalagian, LLP may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Laura E. Krank and/or the Law Offices of Rohlfing & Kalagian, LLP to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.
ORDER
Approved and so ordered.
