STIPULATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE ADR CERTIFICATIONS BY PARTIES AND COUNSEL

CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11, Plaintiffs Technology Properties Limited LLC ("TPL") and MCM Portfolio LLC ("MCM") and Defendants Canon Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc., Falcon Northwest Computer Systems, Inc., HiTi Digital America Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Kingston Technology Company, Inc., Newegg Inc., Rosewill Inc., Seiko Epson Corporation, Epson America, Inc. and Shuttle Computer Group Inc. (collectively, "the parties") respectfully submit this Stipulation for Administrative Relief for Plaintiffs to file the ADR Certifications by Parties and Counsel in the above-captioned matters.

Plaintiffs state as follows in support of this stipulation:

1. Plaintiffs have worked diligently to retain local counsel after this case was transferred to this District.

2. Plaintiffs have not yet been able to retain local counsel. Thus, Plaintiffs have not been able to move the Court for pro hac vice admission of its lead counsel.

3. On October 22, 2014 and October 23, 2014, the Court entered Case Management Scheduling Orders in the above-captioned matters.

4. Plaintiffs have served all parties to the above-captioned matter with the Orders.

5. Defendants do not join in Plaintiffs' statements but do not oppose the relief requested by Plaintiffs.

For these reasons, this stipulation respectfully requests administrative relief for Plaintiffs' undersigned counsel to file the ADR Certifications by Parties and Counsel (attached hereto as Exhibits A and B).

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE ADR CERTIFICATIONS BY PARTIES AND COUNSEL

Pursuant to the above-referenced Stipulation for Administrative Relief for Plaintiffs to File ADR Certifications by Parties and Counsel, for good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiffs' lead counsel may file the ADR Certifications by Parties and Counsel.

EXHIBIT A

Plaintiff Technology Properties Limited LLC's ADR Certification by Parties and Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5 (b), each of the undersigned certifies that he or she has:

(1) Read the handbook entitled "Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California" on the Court's ADR Internet site www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov (Limited printed copies are available from the clerk's office for parties in cases not subject to the court's Electronic Case Filing program (ECF) under Civil L.R. 5-1(b));

(2) Discussed the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court and private entities; and

(3) Considered whether this case might benefit from any of the available dispute resolution options.

EXHIBIT B

Plaintiff MCM Portfolio LLC's ADR Certification by Parties and Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5 (b), each of the undersigned certifies that he or she has:

(1) Read the handbook entitled "Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California' on the Court's ADR Internet site www.adr.eand.uscourts.gov (Limited printed copies are available from the clerkly officelbr parties in cases not subject to the court's Electronic Case Filing program (ECF) under Civil L.R. 5-1 (b));

(2) Discussed the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court and private entities; and

(3) Considered whether this case might benefit from any of the available dispute resolution options.