Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Finjan, Inc. v. Check Point Software Technologies Inc., 5:18-cv-02621-WHO. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190125b07 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO SUBMIT REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO ENFORCE ORDER AND STRIKE INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. ("Finjan") and Defendants Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. and Check Point Software Technologies, Ltd. ("Check Point") (collectively, "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the following request to
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO SUBMIT REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO ENFORCE ORDER AND STRIKE INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. ("Finjan") and Defendants Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. and Check Point Software Technologies, Ltd. ("Check Point") (collectively, "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to the following request to extend by seven days the deadline for Check Point to file a reply in support of Check Point's Motion to Enforce Order and Strike Infringement Contentions ("Motion to Strike"), ECF No. 55.

WHEREAS, on January 3, 2019, Check Point filed a Motion to Strike, ECF No. 55;

WHEREAS, on January 17, 2019, Finjan filed an opposition to Check Point's Motion to Strike, ECF No. 61;

WHEREAS, under Civil Local Rule 7-3(b), the deadline for Check Point to file a reply in support of its Motion to Strike is January 24, 2019;

WHEREAS, the associate who was the primary drafter of Check Point's Motion to Strike suffered an injury over the weekend, and as a result Check Point requested a seven-day extension of the due date for its reply brief in support of that motion;

WHEREAS, in the spirit of good faith and professional conduct, Finjan agreed to Check Point's requested extension, and thus the Parties stipulate to continue the deadline for Check Point to file its reply in support of its Motion to Strike by seven days, until January 31, 2019;

WHEREAS, the Court previously modified the schedule in this case three times: to adjust the briefing schedule for Finjan's Motion to Impute Service, Dkt. No. 35, to extend the hearing date on Finjan's Motion to Impute Service by seven days, Dkt. No. 42, and to adjust the briefing schedule and hearing on Finjan's Motion to Strike and extend Check Point Software Technologies, Ltd.'s time to respond to the complaint, Dkt. No. 52.

WHEREAS, the requested continuance should not have any material effect on the schedule in this case.

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and request that the deadline for Check Point to file a reply in support of its Motion to Strike be extended from January 24, 2019 to January 31, 2019.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(I)

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

The deadline for Check Point to file a reply in support of its Motion to Strike, ECF No. 55, is extended from January 24, 2019 to January 31, 2019.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer