Boyd v. Saul, 2:18-cv-03152-AC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190703b21
Visitors: 27
Filed: Jul. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 02, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . DEWAYNE R. BOYD ("Plaintiff"), and ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner Of Social Security ("Defendant" or the "Commissioner"), hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to a 30-day extension of time to for the Commissioner to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 15). The current deadline is July 10, 2019, and the new deadline w
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . DEWAYNE R. BOYD ("Plaintiff"), and ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner Of Social Security ("Defendant" or the "Commissioner"), hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to a 30-day extension of time to for the Commissioner to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 15). The current deadline is July 10, 2019, and the new deadline wo..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
DEWAYNE R. BOYD ("Plaintiff"), and ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner Of Social Security ("Defendant" or the "Commissioner"), hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, to a 30-day extension of time to for the Commissioner to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 15). The current deadline is July 10, 2019, and the new deadline would be August 8, 2019. The deadline for any reply would be August 27, 2019. This is the first extension of time requested in the above-captioned matter. Defendant requests this additional time because the undersigned attorney was unexpectedly out of the office on medical leave for two days during the week of June 24, 2019 and currently has six dispositive motions due the week of July 8, 2019. Accordingly, the undersigned attorney requires additional time to adequately address the issues that Plaintiff raises in his motion for summary judgment. The parties further stipulate that the scheduling order in the above-captioned matter be modified accordingly.
Respectfully submitted,
LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING
Dated: July 2, 2019 By: /s/ Lawrence David Rohlfing*
LAWRENCE DAVID ROHLFING
Attorney for Plaintiff
[*As authorized by e-mail on July 1, 2019]
McGREGOR W. SCOTT
Dated: July 2, 2019 United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
By: /s/ Sharon Lahey
SHARON LAHEY
Assistant Regional Counsel
ORDER
Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on or before August 8, 2019. Plaintiff shall file any reply on or before August 27, 2019. All other deadlines are modified accordingly.
FootNotes
1. Andrew Saul is now the Commissioner of Social Security and is automatically substituted as a party pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). See also section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (the Act), 42 USC 405(g) (action survives regardless of any change in the person occupying the office of Commissioner of Social Security).
Source: Leagle
