RODRIGUES v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA, C 16-1390 CW. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170203d68
Visitors: 15
Filed: Feb. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 02, 2017
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. CLAUDIA WILKEN , District Judge . On July 1, 2016, the Court granted Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's claims. In that order, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend the claim for benefits against the Bank of America Pension Plan, after exhaustion, and the breach of fiduciary duty claim against Bank of America, and to allege his documents claim against the Plan Administrator, if Plaintiff made a reques
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. CLAUDIA WILKEN , District Judge . On July 1, 2016, the Court granted Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's claims. In that order, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend the claim for benefits against the Bank of America Pension Plan, after exhaustion, and the breach of fiduciary duty claim against Bank of America, and to allege his documents claim against the Plan Administrator, if Plaintiff made a request..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.
CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.
On July 1, 2016, the Court granted Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's claims. In that order, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend the claim for benefits against the Bank of America Pension Plan, after exhaustion, and the breach of fiduciary duty claim against Bank of America, and to allege his documents claim against the Plan Administrator, if Plaintiff made a request for documents from the Plan Administrator and the request was denied. The deadline for Plaintiff to file his amended complaint was December 28, 2016. To date, the Court has received no further filings. Accordingly, Plaintiff is directed to show cause why his case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Any response shall be filed within fourteen days of the date of this order. If Plaintiff does not file a response within that time the Court will dismiss the case for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
