Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Olford v. Colvin, 1:16-cv-00061-BAM. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20161221b55 Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time to January 23, 2017 to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because Defendant's counsel has eight other district court briefs due within the next mo
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time to January 23, 2017 to respond to Plaintiff's opening brief. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because Defendant's counsel has eight other district court briefs due within the next month and will be on leave from December 23rd through January 2nd.

This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings.

The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

Counsel apologizes to the Court for any inconvenience caused by this delay.

ORDER

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, and for cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall have an extension of time until January 23, 2017, in which to file an Opposition to Plaintiff's Opening Brief; and that all other deadlines set forth in the Case Management Order shall be extended accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer