Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MAZUR v. MILO'S KITCHEN, LLC, 12-1011. (2013)

Court: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20130807c42 Visitors: 27
Filed: Jun. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2013
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER CATHY BISSOON, District Judge. On August 13, 2012, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules for Magistrates. On May 24, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 46) recommending that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 20) be granted regarding the unjust enrichment claims stated in Count V of t
More

MEMORANDUM ORDER

CATHY BISSOON, District Judge.

On August 13, 2012, this case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

On May 24, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 46) recommending that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 20) be granted regarding the unjust enrichment claims stated in Count V of the Complaint, but otherwise denied. Service of the Report and Recommendation was made, and Defendants have filed Objections. See Docs. 47 & 48.

After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the Objections thereto, the following Order is entered:

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 20) is GRANTED regarding unjust enrichment (Count V), and DENIED in all other respects. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Kelly dated May 24, 2013 is hereby adopted as the Opinion of the District Court.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer