REESE v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, 2:13-cv-559 WBS DB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180828a04
Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Pursuant to the status conference held on August 27, 2018, this case is set for trial on plaintiff's Bane Act claim on November 6, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 5. Defendants' brief regarding specific intent under the Bane Act and the enforceability of the judgment in this case shall be filed by September 17, 2018. Plaintiff's brief in response shall be filed by October 1, 2018. Any reply by defendants shall be filed by October 9, 2018. The matter
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Pursuant to the status conference held on August 27, 2018, this case is set for trial on plaintiff's Bane Act claim on November 6, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 5. Defendants' brief regarding specific intent under the Bane Act and the enforceability of the judgment in this case shall be filed by September 17, 2018. Plaintiff's brief in response shall be filed by October 1, 2018. Any reply by defendants shall be filed by October 9, 2018. The matter ..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
Pursuant to the status conference held on August 27, 2018, this case is set for trial on plaintiff's Bane Act claim on November 6, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 5. Defendants' brief regarding specific intent under the Bane Act and the enforceability of the judgment in this case shall be filed by September 17, 2018. Plaintiff's brief in response shall be filed by October 1, 2018. Any reply by defendants shall be filed by October 9, 2018. The matter is set for further status conference on October 22, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
