Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MGM Resorts International v. Acosta, 2:18-cv-01288-APG-PAL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181102k39 Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 01, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING STAY PENDING MEDIATION ORDER ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Defendants dispute whether Plaintiffs are liable for injuries sustained by Defendants at the Route 91 Harvest Festival; WHEREAS related actions regarding Plaintiffs' potential liability arising from the Route 91 Harvest Festival are pending in this and other jurisdictions; WHEREAS counsel for the parties in this action and the related actions have met and conferred, and currently
More

STIPULATION REGARDING STAY PENDING MEDIATION

ORDER

WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Defendants dispute whether Plaintiffs are liable for injuries sustained by Defendants at the Route 91 Harvest Festival;

WHEREAS related actions regarding Plaintiffs' potential liability arising from the Route 91 Harvest Festival are pending in this and other jurisdictions;

WHEREAS counsel for the parties in this action and the related actions have met and conferred, and currently are planning and scheduling a mediation;

WHEREAS the parties believe that a stay of all pending litigation would facilitate mediation and make resolution more likely; and

WHEREAS the parties are concurrently stipulating to stay this action and related actions, including Sheppard v. Mandalay Bay, No. 2-18-cv-01120 (D. Nev.); Maggiore v. MGM, No. 2:18cv-5640 (C.D. Cal.); Ramirez v. MGM, No. 2-18-cv-5564 (C.D. Cal.), and the declaratory judgment actions filed by Defendants, MGM v. Aase, No. 2:18-cv-06113 (C.D. Cal.); MGM v. Abner, No. 2:18-cv-06197 (C.D. Cal.); MGM v. Corbin, No. 3:18-cv-00168 (D. Alaska); MGM v. Booth, No. 2:18-cv-02250 (D. Ariz.); MGM v. Acosta, No. 2:18-cv-01288 (D. Nev.); MGM v. Eardley, No. 2:18-cv-00567 (D. Utah); MGM v. Brasfield, No. 1:18-cv-22883 (S.D. Fla.); MGM v. Archembeault, No. 4:18-cv-02465 (S.D. Tex.); MGM v. Socci, No. 1:18-cv-06451 (S.D.N.Y.);

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT:

1. All proceedings in this action shall be stayed pending mediation;

2. This stay is conditioned upon the entry of this order and a similar stay order, voluntary dismissal, or other resolution in each of the matters identified above within 30 days, if the conditions of the stay are not satisfied, the parties will advise the Court, and those motions will be set for the next available date or by such agreement of the parties as is acceptable to the Court;

3. The parties shall report to the Court on the status of the mediation within 60 days of entry of the stay in this action, and then every 60 days thereafter;

4. Any party may revoke its agreement to stay this action by providing the other parties and the Court 15 days' written notice; and

5. If any party revokes its agreement to stay this action, any currently-pending motions shall be set for the next date that the Court is available as of the time of the revocation of the agreement to a stay.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer