Ross v. The United States of America, 5:17-CV-02775-EJD. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20171201961
Filed: Nov. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 30, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT'S ANSWER EDWARD J. DAVILA , District Judge . On November 17, 2017, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part defendant's motion to dismiss. Accordingly, defendant's answer would normally be due by December 1, 2017. Defendant's counsel has requested, and plaintiff's counsel has agreed, that defendant may have an extension to December 15, 2017 to file its answer. This case is scheduled for a case mana
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT'S ANSWER EDWARD J. DAVILA , District Judge . On November 17, 2017, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part defendant's motion to dismiss. Accordingly, defendant's answer would normally be due by December 1, 2017. Defendant's counsel has requested, and plaintiff's counsel has agreed, that defendant may have an extension to December 15, 2017 to file its answer. This case is scheduled for a case manag..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT'S ANSWER
EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge.
On November 17, 2017, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part defendant's motion to dismiss. Accordingly, defendant's answer would normally be due by December 1, 2017. Defendant's counsel has requested, and plaintiff's counsel has agreed, that defendant may have an extension to December 15, 2017 to file its answer. This case is scheduled for a case management conference on January 11, 2018, so counsel for the parties do not believe that this requested extension will cause any delay in this case.1
For the foregoing reasons, the parties, through their counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE AND REQUEST that the deadline for defendant's answer to the complaint in this action be extended to December 15, 2017.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Respectfully submitted,
COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY LLP
/s/ Emanuel B. Townsend
Dated: November 29, 2017 By: _______________________________
NIALL P. McCARTHY
PETE McCLOSKEY, JR.
EMANUEL B. TOWNSEND
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Douglas Wayne Ross, Jr., Nicole Ross,
and Neville Ross
Dated: November 29, 2017 BRIAN J. STRETCH
United States Attorney
/s/ Claire T. Cormier
By: _______________________________
CLAIRE T. CORMIER2
Assistant United States Attorney
[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Counsel note that plaintiff's counsel has indicated that the dismissed plaintiffs will be filing a new lawsuit soon, and that they anticipate seeking to consolidate the two actions. This may result in some future delay in the existing case.
2. I, Claire T. Cormier, hereby attest that I have been authorized to submit the electronic signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
Source: Leagle
