Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Samaan v. Rains, 2:17-cv-02219-TLN-DB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20171108886 Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 06, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO REMAND CASE TO SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Plaintiff Nabil Samaan and Defendant Mark Rains[ 1 ], by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 1. On June 9, 2016, Plaintiff commenced an action in the Superior Court of California in and for the County of Sacramento titled Nabil Samaan v. Mark Rains, and DOES 1-10, as Case No. 34-2016-00195759. 2. On or around August 1, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motio
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO REMAND CASE TO SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT

Plaintiff Nabil Samaan and Defendant Mark Rains[1], by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

1. On June 9, 2016, Plaintiff commenced an action in the Superior Court of California in and for the County of Sacramento titled Nabil Samaan v. Mark Rains, and DOES 1-10, as Case No. 34-2016-00195759.

2. On or around August 1, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion to file a First Amended Complaint.

3. On or around September 18, 2017, the Superior Court granted Plaintiff's motion to file a First Amended Complaint.

4. On September 22, 2017, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint adding the County of Sacramento as a defendant and asserting causes of action for defamation, violations of California Civil Code § 52.1 and Sacramento County Code § 9.20.010, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and violations of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

5. The first date upon which Defendant Rains received a copy of said complaint was September 25, 2017, via service upon his attorneys of record.

6. On October 23, 2017, Defendant Mark Rains filed a Notice of Removal of the Action to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b) based on Plaintiff's claims brought under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

7. On October 25, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Request for Dismissal of the federal causes of action for violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution in the Sacramento County Superior Court.

8. Plaintiff agrees to voluntarily dismiss the federal causes of action for violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution from the First Amended Complaint, which removes the basis for this Court's jurisdiction.

9. Therefore, the Parties stipulate that this action should immediately be remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court.

10. Pursuant to this Stipulation, Plaintiff's Sixth Cause of Action for "Violation of Constitutional First and Fourteenth Amendment Rights," along with any other claims that may be construed to be federal question claims over which this court has original jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and any other federal claims against Defendants Mark Rains or the County of Sacramento, are dismissed with prejudice.

11. This Stipulation moots all pending motions before this Court, and all pending deadlines and hearings in this case should be taken off the Court's calendar.

12. The Parties agree that the time for Defendant Rains to file a response to the First Amended Complaint will be in accordance with California Code of Civil Procedure § 430.90.

WHEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate that good cause exists to remand this case back to the Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2016-00195759.

ORDER

Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. This action immediately be remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court;

2. This Stipulation moots all pending motions before this Court, and all pending deadlines and hearings in this case shall be taken off the Court's calendar; and

3. The time for Defendant Rains to file a response to the First Amended Complaint will be in accordance with California Code of Civil Procedure § 430.90.

FootNotes


1. The County of Sacramento has not been served with the complaint or otherwise appeared in this matter.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer