Garrett v. Igbinosa, 1:16-cv-00259-LJO-JDP (PC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180510842
Visitors: 24
Filed: May 09, 2018
Latest Update: May 09, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS NON-COGNIZABLE CLAIMS (ECF No. 49) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . James Jamil Garrett ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 3, 2018, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng entered findings and recommendat
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS NON-COGNIZABLE CLAIMS (ECF No. 49) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . James Jamil Garrett ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 3, 2018, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng entered findings and recommendati..
More
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS NON-COGNIZABLE CLAIMS
(ECF No. 49)
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, Chief District Judge.
James Jamil Garrett ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On April 3, 2018, Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng entered findings and recommendations, recommending that this action continue to proceed only on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment and First Amendment claims against Defendant Igbinosa; and that the remaining Eighth Amendment claims be dismissed with prejudice. (ECF No. 49.) Plaintiff was given an opportunity to object to the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff filed his objections on April 18, 2018. (ECF No. 52.)
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations issued by the magistrate judge on April 3, 2018, (ECF No. 49), are ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. This action shall continue to proceed only on Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment and First Amendment claims against Defendant Igbinosa; and
3. The remaining Eighth Amendment claims are dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
