Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

King County v. BP P.L.C., 2:18-cv-00758. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20180703721 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2018
Summary: [ PROPOSED ] ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' STIPULATED MOTION REGARDING SCHEDULE FOR FRCP 26(a)(1) CONFERENCE, INITIAL DISCLOSURES, AND JOINT STATUS REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN ROBERT S. LASNIK , District Judge . The Court, having received and reviewed the Parties' Stipulated Motion, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The deadline for a FRCP 26(f) Conference shall be July 11, 2018. 2. Initial Disclosures pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1) shall be due by July 18, 2018. 3. A Combine
More

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' STIPULATED MOTION REGARDING SCHEDULE FOR FRCP 26(a)(1) CONFERENCE, INITIAL DISCLOSURES, AND JOINT STATUS REPORT AND DISCOVERY PLAN

The Court, having received and reviewed the Parties' Stipulated Motion, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The deadline for a FRCP 26(f) Conference shall be July 11, 2018.

2. Initial Disclosures pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1) shall be due by July 18, 2018.

3. A Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan as required by FRCP 26(f) and LCR 26(f) shall be due by July 25, 2018.

4. Neither the Stipulated Motion nor this Order shall operate as an admission of any factual allegation or legal conclusion, nor shall it operate as a waiver of any right, defense, affirmative defense, claim, or objection, including lack of personal jurisdiction, insufficient process, or insufficient service of process.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer