Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Finjan, Inc. v. Juniper Network, Inc., C 17-05659 WHA. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20181005a57 Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 04, 2018
Summary: ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The Court has received a letter dated October 4 from defendant Juniper Network, Inc., requesting that an interrogatory answer quoted on page two be useable in the related IPR proceeding notwithstanding the protective order in this case (Dkt. No. 199). The Court is inclined to agree that Juniper should be allowed to use the interrogatory answer in question so long as they are filed under seal pursuant to a protective order that offe
More

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE

The Court has received a letter dated October 4 from defendant Juniper Network, Inc., requesting that an interrogatory answer quoted on page two be useable in the related IPR proceeding notwithstanding the protective order in this case (Dkt. No. 199). The Court is inclined to agree that Juniper should be allowed to use the interrogatory answer in question so long as they are filed under seal pursuant to a protective order that offers the same protection in this case.

On or before OCTOBER 9 AT NOON, plaintiff Finjan, Inc., must (in writing) either agree to its use in the related IPR proceeding or show cause in this Court by sworn declaration why such permission should not be granted. This matter will be decided based upon the papers inasmuch as the Court will be absent for most of the next ten days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer