Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mason v. MediFit, 3:17-cv-02542-JST. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180613b47 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER RULES 60(B)(1), (3), (6). JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Plaintiff Shelia Mason ("Plaintiff") and Defendant MediFit Corporate Services, Inc., d/b/a "EXOS" ("Defendant"), by and through its counsel of record (collectively, the "Parties"), hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Plaintiff's Reply In Support of Motion for Relief Under Rules 60(b)(1), (3), (6) from June 14, 2018 to June 18, 201
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER RULES 60(B)(1), (3), (6).

Plaintiff Shelia Mason ("Plaintiff") and Defendant MediFit Corporate Services, Inc., d/b/a "EXOS" ("Defendant"), by and through its counsel of record (collectively, the "Parties"), hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Plaintiff's Reply In Support of Motion for Relief Under Rules 60(b)(1), (3), (6) from June 14, 2018 to June 18, 2018.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer