Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. v. Dropbox Inc., 4:16-cv-00119-HSG (KAW). (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190311869 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER TERMINATING 2/22/19 JOINT LETTER Re: Dkt. No. 273 KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . On February 22, 2019, the parties filed a joint letter, in which Synchronoss seeks to preclude Dropbox from relying on the Opening Expert Report of Gregor Purdy. (Joint Letter, Dkt. No. 273 at 1.) Therein, Synchronoss argues that Mr. Purdy's opinions fall outside the scope of expert testimony, such that he should have been disclosed in advance of the fact discovery deadline. Id. Dropbox disagr
More

ORDER TERMINATING 2/22/19 JOINT LETTER

Re: Dkt. No. 273

On February 22, 2019, the parties filed a joint letter, in which Synchronoss seeks to preclude Dropbox from relying on the Opening Expert Report of Gregor Purdy. (Joint Letter, Dkt. No. 273 at 1.) Therein, Synchronoss argues that Mr. Purdy's opinions fall outside the scope of expert testimony, such that he should have been disclosed in advance of the fact discovery deadline. Id. Dropbox disagrees, and contends that Mr. Purdy's testimony is proper expert testimony. Id.

This dispute, however, is a motion in limine fashioned as a discovery dispute, so it is not ripe for adjudication. Accordingly, the joint letter is TERMINATED. The parties may refile this dispute as a motion in limine before the presiding judge should the case proceed to trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer