U.S. v. Gonzalez, 2:13-CR-377. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160520869
Visitors: 2
Filed: May 19, 2016
Latest Update: May 19, 2016
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . By prior order, the case is set for a status hearing on May 19, 2016. The defendant is charged in this case with crimes related to the production of child pornography. The State of California has charged the defendant with realted crimes. By agreement of the parties, the Court remanded the defendant into state custody to face those charges. The charges remain pending in Yolo County. On May 4, 2016, the Yolo C
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . By prior order, the case is set for a status hearing on May 19, 2016. The defendant is charged in this case with crimes related to the production of child pornography. The State of California has charged the defendant with realted crimes. By agreement of the parties, the Court remanded the defendant into state custody to face those charges. The charges remain pending in Yolo County. On May 4, 2016, the Yolo Co..
More
AMENDED STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
By prior order, the case is set for a status hearing on May 19, 2016. The defendant is charged in this case with crimes related to the production of child pornography. The State of California has charged the defendant with realted crimes. By agreement of the parties, the Court remanded the defendant into state custody to face those charges. The charges remain pending in Yolo County. On May 4, 2016, the Yolo County District Attorney's office informed the government by email that the defendant's preliminary hearing was May 3, 2016, and he was held to answer on all counts and enhancements. Arraignment on the state charges is scheduled for May 18, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. The parties stipulate and request that the Court find and order:
1. That the current status conference be continued to August 25, 2016.
2. That for the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of May 19, 2016, to August 25, 2016, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(B), [Local Code C] as to the defendant because it is a period of delay resulting from trial with respect to other charges against the defendant.
3. That for the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of May 19, 2016, to August 25, 2016, inclusive, is also deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7), [Local Code T4] as to the defendant because the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
