Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

InfoSPAN, INC. v. EMIRATES NBD BANK PJSC, 8:14-CV-1679 JVS (ANx). (2016)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20160105627 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS INFOSPAN, INC. AND INFOSPAN (GULF), INC. JAMES V. SELNA , District Judge . This above-captioned action was compelled to arbitration in California for Plaintiffs InfoSpan, Inc.'s and InfoSpan (Gulf), Inc.'s ("Plaintiffs") claim for declaratory relief against the Defendant Emirates NBD Bank PJSC ("Bank"). On September 28, 2015, the Court issued an Order compelling arbitration of Plaintiffs' claim for declaratory relief. The parties have st
More

ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS INFOSPAN, INC. AND INFOSPAN (GULF), INC.

This above-captioned action was compelled to arbitration in California for Plaintiffs InfoSpan, Inc.'s and InfoSpan (Gulf), Inc.'s ("Plaintiffs") claim for declaratory relief against the Defendant Emirates NBD Bank PJSC ("Bank").

On September 28, 2015, the Court issued an Order compelling arbitration of Plaintiffs' claim for declaratory relief. The parties have stipulated the Hon. Gary L. Taylor (ret.) will serve as the arbitrator. Subsequently, on December 14, 2015, the Court issued an Order denying Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Pending Arbitration while also retaining jurisdiction in this action for the limited purpose of enforcing its Order to compel arbitration. The Court now issues a final judgment as follows:

1. Judgment is entered in Plaintiffs' favor on the Bank's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, as set forth in the Minute Order issued on July 27, 2015.

2. Judgment is entered in Plaintiffs' favor on Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Arbitration, as set forth in the Minute Order issued on September 28, 2015. 3. Judgment is entered in the Bank's favor on Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay

Pending Arbitration, as set forth in the Minute Order issued on December 14, 2015.

4. All other claims asserted and parties named in this action were previously dismissed with prejudice or are hereby dismissed with prejudice.

5. The Court retains jurisdiction in this action for the limited purpose of enforcing its Order to compel arbitration.

6. As the prevailing parties in this litigation, Plaintiffs are entitled to recover costs. Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1); Civ. L.R. 54-1. In accordance with Local Rule 54-2, Plaintiffs shall file their Notice of Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs and Proposed Bill of Costs within fourteen (14) days after the entry of this judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer