Filed: Apr. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 20, 2015
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT , District Judge . On April 9, 2015, Plaintiff filed notice of nonsuit (ECF No. 11), purporting to give notice of Plaintiff's "voluntary dismissal without prejudice of its Complaint." By order entered April 13, 2015, the Court notified the parties that, given the procedural posture of this case, it would construe Plaintiff's notice as a motion for voluntary dismissal, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2). The only defendant remaining in this case, Metro Urgent Care LLP, has
Summary: ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT , District Judge . On April 9, 2015, Plaintiff filed notice of nonsuit (ECF No. 11), purporting to give notice of Plaintiff's "voluntary dismissal without prejudice of its Complaint." By order entered April 13, 2015, the Court notified the parties that, given the procedural posture of this case, it would construe Plaintiff's notice as a motion for voluntary dismissal, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2). The only defendant remaining in this case, Metro Urgent Care LLP, has f..
More
ORDER
SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge.
On April 9, 2015, Plaintiff filed notice of nonsuit (ECF No. 11), purporting to give notice of Plaintiff's "voluntary dismissal without prejudice of its Complaint." By order entered April 13, 2015, the Court notified the parties that, given the procedural posture of this case, it would construe Plaintiff's notice as a motion for voluntary dismissal, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2). The only defendant remaining in this case, Metro Urgent Care LLP, has filed a response (ECF No. 16) stating that it has no objection to voluntary dismissal.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
