Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CRUTHIS v. VISION'S, 4:12CV244 KGB. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20130808548 Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 07, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2013
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge. Plaintiffs' motion to compel responses to discovery is granted in part and denied without prejudice in part (Dkt. No. 50). Separate defendant Vision's, individually and d/b/a Visions and/or d/b/a Visions Cabaret ("Visions"), is ordered to supplement its responses to Plaintiff Keyli Cruthis' First Set of Interrogatories and Plaintiff Keyli Cruthis' First Request for Production of Documents in light of the Court's Opinion and Order of August 7, 2013. Vis
More

ORDER

KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs' motion to compel responses to discovery is granted in part and denied without prejudice in part (Dkt. No. 50). Separate defendant Vision's, individually and d/b/a Visions and/or d/b/a Visions Cabaret ("Visions"), is ordered to supplement its responses to Plaintiff Keyli Cruthis' First Set of Interrogatories and Plaintiff Keyli Cruthis' First Request for Production of Documents in light of the Court's Opinion and Order of August 7, 2013. Visions is ordered to supplement these responses within 14 days of the date of this Order.

To the extent Visions continues to take legal positions in response to this discovery that plaintiffs contend are unsupported in case law or inapplicable to the facts of this case, plaintiffs may renew their motion to compel citing with specificity the discovery request and legal position at issue.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer