Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

USA v. Jaycox, 2:14-cr-0010-GEB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180116848 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 12, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. , Senior District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between McGregor W. Scott, United States Attorney, through Matthew G. Morris, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Jerome Price, attorney for Chad Carl Jaycox, that the status conference scheduled for January 12, 2018 be vacated and continued to February
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between McGregor W. Scott, United States Attorney, through Matthew G. Morris, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Jerome Price, attorney for Chad Carl Jaycox, that the status conference scheduled for January 12, 2018 be vacated and continued to February 23, 2018 at 9:00 a.m.

The reasons for the continuance are to continue investigating the facts of the case, reviewing discovery and negotiating a resolution to this matter.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from this order's date through and including October 20, 2017, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

The Court orders the time from the date the parties stipulated, up to and including February 23, 2018 shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv) [reasonable time for counsel to prepare] and General Order 479, (Local Code T4). It is further ordered the January 12, 2018 status conference shall be continued until February 23, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. before District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer