MILLS v. FREE FLOW SPAS, 12-CV-4091. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140408669
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2014
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge. Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Defendant Free Flow Spas. ECF No. 53. Plaintiffs state that they have settled all claims against Separate Defendant Free Flow Spas, and they move the Court to dismiss these claims. Upon consideration, the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' claims against Separate Defendant Free Flow Spas are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. If any party desires that the terms of settlement be a part of the record therei
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge. Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Defendant Free Flow Spas. ECF No. 53. Plaintiffs state that they have settled all claims against Separate Defendant Free Flow Spas, and they move the Court to dismiss these claims. Upon consideration, the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' claims against Separate Defendant Free Flow Spas are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. If any party desires that the terms of settlement be a part of the record therein..
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Defendant Free Flow Spas. ECF No. 53. Plaintiffs state that they have settled all claims against Separate Defendant Free Flow Spas, and they move the Court to dismiss these claims. Upon consideration, the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' claims against Separate Defendant Free Flow Spas are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
If any party desires that the terms of settlement be a part of the record therein, those terms should be reduced to writing and filed with the Court within thirty (30) days of the entry of this order. The Court retains jurisdiction to vacate this order and to reopen this action upon cause shown that the settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
