Johnson v. Sweet Spark, Inc., 2:17-CV-02474-WBS-DB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180829874
Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO COMPLETE VDRP AND TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby move the Court for an order extending the time to complete VDRP and to reset the status (pretrial scheduling) conference. In support of this Motion, the parties state as follows: 1. Plaintiff Scott Johnson filed his complaint on November 24, 2017. 2. Sweet Spark, Inc. filed its answer on April 13, 2018. 3. On May 3
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO COMPLETE VDRP AND TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby move the Court for an order extending the time to complete VDRP and to reset the status (pretrial scheduling) conference. In support of this Motion, the parties state as follows: 1. Plaintiff Scott Johnson filed his complaint on November 24, 2017. 2. Sweet Spark, Inc. filed its answer on April 13, 2018. 3. On May 30..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO COMPLETE VDRP AND TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby move the Court for an order extending the time to complete VDRP and to reset the status (pretrial scheduling) conference. In support of this Motion, the parties state as follows:
1. Plaintiff Scott Johnson filed his complaint on November 24, 2017.
2. Sweet Spark, Inc. filed its answer on April 13, 2018.
3. On May 30, 2018, the Court ordered the case stayed and referred to VDRP (Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program) for an early settlement conference, and set a VDRP completion date of August 13, 2018.
4. On August 14, 2018, a VDRP neutral was proposed for appointment. One of the parties objected to the appointment. The parties are waiting for a new proposed neutral to be named.
5. The parties request an extension of time to complete VDRP to November 16, 2018. The parties also request that the current stay of proceedings remain in effect, as outlined in the Court's May 30, 2018 order. Within five (5) days of completion of VDRP, the parties shall file a joint statement indicating whether settlement was reached.
6. In addition, the parties request resetting the September 10, 2018 status conference to a date after November 16, 2018. The parties shall file an Amended Joint Status Report in advance of the status conference.
WHEREFORE, the parties, through their undersigned counsel, respectfully request that the Court grant this motion for extension of time to complete VDRP to November 16, 2018, and to re-set the September 10, 2018 status conference.
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION, THE COURT ORDERS THE FOLLOWING:
1. The parties shall complete VDRP no later than November 16, 2018.
2. Within five (5) days of completing VDRP, the parties shall file a joint statement advising the Court whether settlement was reached.
3. The status (pretrial scheduling) conference is reset to December 17, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.
4. The parties shall file an Amended Joint Status Report no later than December 3, 2018.
Source: Leagle
