Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

A.P. v. Community Care Licensing, 2:13-cv-01588-JAM-AC. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160922937 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 21, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER TO ALLOW FOR PHASED DISCOVERY JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . COMES NOW THE PARTIES by and through their respective counsel and subject to the approval of this Court, hereby stipulate and respectfully request that this Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order dated July 12, 2016 [ECF No. 68], be modified to reflect new deadlines as follows, or as to accommodate the Court's docket, in order for the parties to conduct phased discovery m
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER TO ALLOW FOR PHASED DISCOVERY

COMES NOW THE PARTIES by and through their respective counsel and subject to the approval of this Court, hereby stipulate and respectfully request that this Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order dated July 12, 2016 [ECF No. 68], be modified to reflect new deadlines as follows, or as to accommodate the Court's docket, in order for the parties to conduct phased discovery moving forward:

Current Schedule Expert Disclosure: Oct. 17, 2016 Supplemental Expert Disclosure: Oct. 31, 2016 Close of All Discovery: Nov. 21, 2016 Filing of Dispositive Motions: Dec. 21, 2016 Hearing of Dispositive Motions: Jan. 24, 2017, at 1:30p Joint Pretrial Statement: June 2, 2017 Final Pretrial Conference: June 9, 2017 at 11:00a Trial: July 17, 2017 Proposed New Schedule Close of Phase 1 Discovery: Nov. 21, 2016 Filing of Dispositive Motions, Phase 1: Dec. 21, 2016 Hearing of Dispositive Motions, Phase 1: Jan. 24, 2017, at 1:30p Expert Disclosure: June 8, 2017 Supplemental Expert Disclosure: June 29. 2017 Close of Phase 2 Discovery: July 24, 2017 Filing of Dispositive Motion, Phase 2: August 22, 2017 Hearing of Dispositive Motions, Phase 2: September 19, 2017, at 1:30p Joint Pretrial Statement: December 1, 2017 Final Pretrial Conference: December 8, 2017, at 11:00a Trial: January 8, 2018 at 9:00 a.m.

WHEREAS, counsel for all parties have met and discussed the posture of this case, and agree that it would be in the interests of justice and judicial economy and that good causes exists for the modification of the scheduling order;

WHEREAS, the parties participated in a judicially supervised settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Carolyn Delaney on September 9, 2016, but were unable to reach a settlement;

WHEREAS, during the settlement conference on September 9, the parties discussed with Judge Delaney, and she approved, the possibility of conducting phased discovery moving forward in order for the parties to conduct limited fact discovery prior to Defendants filing their motion for summary judgment, and postponing expert discovery and any other fact discovery depending on the outcome of Defendants' motion;

WHEREAS, allowing the parties to extend the deadlines as requested will save the parties time and expenses in an effort to resolve the purely legal questions incumbent in this case;

WHEREAS, this request is not being made for the purpose of delay, or any other improper purpose;

WHEREAS, continuing the trial date and pretrial deadlines will not prejudice any party or their counsel; and

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between the parties that this Court modifies the pretrial deadlines and trial date as set forth above.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer