Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Gonzalez, 2:13-cr-377 MCE. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170504a64 Visitors: 16
Filed: May 03, 2017
Latest Update: May 03, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . The parties stipulate, through respective counsel, that the Court should reschedule the status conference set for May 4, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., to May 11, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. Counsel for Mr. Gonzalez requires time to confer with him about discovery, a proposed settlement, and a pending state prosecution. Counsel and the defendant agree that the Court should exclude the time from the date of this
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

The parties stipulate, through respective counsel, that the Court should reschedule the status conference set for May 4, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., to May 11, 2017, at 10:00 a.m.

Counsel for Mr. Gonzalez requires time to confer with him about discovery, a proposed settlement, and a pending state prosecution.

Counsel and the defendant agree that the Court should exclude the time from the date of this order through May 11, 2017, when it computes the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7), Local Code T4.

Counsel and the defendant also agree that the ends of justice served by the Court granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, adopts the stipulation in its entirety as its order. It specifically finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court further finds that the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

The Court orders the status conference rescheduled for May 11, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. Time from the date of the parties stipulation, up to and including May 11, 2017, excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7), Local Code T4.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer