SMITH v. COLVIN, 1:13-cv-01079. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20141030851
Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2014
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed October 10, 2014, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 11. Judge Bryant recommends that the Administrative Law Judge's decision, denying benefits to Plaintiff in the above-styled case be affirmed, as the decision is supported by substantial evidence in the record. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommen
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed October 10, 2014, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 11. Judge Bryant recommends that the Administrative Law Judge's decision, denying benefits to Plaintiff in the above-styled case be affirmed, as the decision is supported by substantial evidence in the record. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommend..
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed October 10, 2014, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 11. Judge Bryant recommends that the Administrative Law Judge's decision, denying benefits to Plaintiff in the above-styled case be affirmed, as the decision is supported by substantial evidence in the record. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. The decision of the ALJ to deny Plaintiff benefits is AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
