Filed: Sep. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 18, 2013
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. Plaintiffs City of San Jose, City of San Jose as successor agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jose, and the San Jose Diridon Development Authority (collectively "San Jose" or "Plaintiffs") and Defendants the Office of the Commissioner of Baseball and Allan H. Selig (collectively "MLB" or "Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties"), jointly submit this Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order to E
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge. Plaintiffs City of San Jose, City of San Jose as successor agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jose, and the San Jose Diridon Development Authority (collectively "San Jose" or "Plaintiffs") and Defendants the Office of the Commissioner of Baseball and Allan H. Selig (collectively "MLB" or "Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties"), jointly submit this Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order to Ex..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE
RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs City of San Jose, City of San Jose as successor agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jose, and the San Jose Diridon Development Authority (collectively "San Jose" or "Plaintiffs") and Defendants the Office of the Commissioner of Baseball and Allan H. Selig (collectively "MLB" or "Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties"), jointly submit this Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend ADR Deadline.
WHEREAS, on June 18, 2013, the Court assigned this matter to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Multi-Option Program (see Dkt. 4);
WHEREAS, Local Rules require the Parties to either stipulate to an ADR option or request a telephone conference with ADR staff (see N.D. Cal. Civ. L:R. 16-8(c); N.D. Cal. ADR L.R. 3-5(c));
WHEREAS, the Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss all of Plaintiffs' claims for failure to state a claim (see Dkt. 25);
WHEREAS, the Parties do not believe they can settle on an agreed ADR process until the Court clarifies the scope of this matter by ruling on the Motion to Dismiss.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the deadline to file a Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Telephone Conference is hereby extended until 30 days after the Court rules on any Motion to Dismiss.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
