Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

IN RE CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 07-cv-5944 SC (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141028b75 Visitors: 21
Filed: Oct. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PANASONIC DEFENDANTS' SUPPLEMENTAL ACTIONS RESPONSES TO INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. This Stipulation and Proposed Order between the Indirect-Purchaser Plaintiffs ("IPPs") and Panasonic Corporation, f/k/a Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. ("Panasonic Corp."), Panasonic Corporation of North America ("PNA"), and MT Picture Display Co
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PANASONIC DEFENDANTS' SUPPLEMENTAL ACTIONS RESPONSES TO INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION TO COMPEL

SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.

This Stipulation and Proposed Order between the Indirect-Purchaser Plaintiffs ("IPPs") and Panasonic Corporation, f/k/a Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. ("Panasonic Corp."), Panasonic Corporation of North America ("PNA"), and MT Picture Display Co., Ltd. ("MTPD") (collectively, "Panasonic Defendants") (together, the "Parties") is made with respect to the following facts and recitals:

WHEREAS, the IPPs and the Panasonic Defendants have met and conferred and have resolved all outstanding discovery issues with regard to IPPs' motion to compel supplemental responses from the Panasonic Defendants to IPPs' First Set of Interrogatories to all Defendants ("Interrogatories"), which was filed with the Special Master on September 12, 2014;

WHEREAS, the Panasonic Defendants have agreed to supplement their responses to Interrogatory No. 7, as it relates to their affirmative defenses Nos. 21-41;

WHEREAS, Panasonic Defendants have also agreed to supplement their responses to Interrogatory Nos. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 18, 22, 23 and 24;

WHEREAS, the Panasonic Defendants agree to supplement their responses to the above-described Interrogatories by October 17, 2014;

WHEREAS, the Panasonic Defendants agree to extend the deadline by which the IPPs may file a motion to compel regarding the Panasonic Defendants' supplemental responses to the above-described Interrogatories to October 24, 2014; and

WHEREAS, the IPPs hereby withdraw their September 12, 2014 motion to compel supplemental interrogatory responses from the Panasonic Defendants.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the undersigned counsel that:

1. The Panasonic Defendants will serve supplemental responses to the IPPs' Interrogatory Nos. 7 (regarding affirmative defenses Nos. 21-41), 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 18, 22, 23 and 24, no later than October 17, 2014; 2. The IPPs may file a motion to compel regarding the Panasonic Defendants' supplemental responses to the IPPs' Interrogatory Nos. 7 (regarding affirmative defenses Nos. 21-41), 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 18, 23 and 24, no later than October 24, 2014; and 3. The IPPs withdraw their September 12, 2014 motion to compel supplemental interrogatory responses from the Panasonic Defendants.

The undersigned Parties jointly and respectfully request that the Court enter this stipulation as an order.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer