Filed: Aug. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARINGS ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . STIPULATION AND ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS AND COUNTY OF DEFENDANT SACRAMENTO'S MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT The parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows: 1. The parties have two motions pending in this action. First, the Plaintiffs have filed
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARINGS ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . STIPULATION AND ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS AND COUNTY OF DEFENDANT SACRAMENTO'S MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT The parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows: 1. The parties have two motions pending in this action. First, the Plaintiffs have filed ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING HEARINGS ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS AND COUNTY OF DEFENDANT SACRAMENTO'S MOTION TO STAY ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT
The parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate as follows:
1. The parties have two motions pending in this action. First, the Plaintiffs have filed a Motion for Attorney Fees (ECF Doc No. 573), which per the parties' most recent stipulation, is scheduled to be heard on August 10, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., in Department 3 (ECF Doc No. 577).
2. Second, Defendant County of Sacramento ("County") has filed a Motion to Stay Enforcement of Judgment (ECF Doc No. 586), which is scheduled to be heard on August 24, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. in Department 3.
3. In response to the Motion for Attorney Fees, the County, in conjunction with its opposition to that motion, retained an expert witness who submitted a report that included several exhibits and voluminous attachments. The Plaintiffs require additional time to review and reply to this evidence beyond what the current briefing schedule permits.
4. Following the County's filing of the Motion to Stay, the parties have continued to meet and confer regarding the enforcement of the Judgment (ECF Doc No. 530) and, in an effort to seek a resolution of that matter pending appeal, desire to have additional time to continue their discussions.
5. To allow the Plaintiffs to have the necessary time to reply to the County's opposition to the Motion for Attorney Fees, and to allow the parties to exhaust their efforts to discuss enforcement of the Judgment pending appeal, the parties stipulate that the hearings on the Motion for Attorney Fees and Motion to Stay Enforcement of the Judgment shall both be continued to September 21, at 10:00 a.m., in Department 3.
6. The Plaintiffs' reply in support of their Motion for Attorney Fees, and the Defendants' and Plaintiffs oppositions and reply related to the Motion for Stay of Enforcement of the Judgment, shall be filed on or before the dates required by Local Rule 230 based on the new, September 21, 2018 hearing dates for those motions.
7. The parties further agree that the previously agreed stay of execution of the Judgment, as set forth in their original stipulation on this matter (ECF Doc. No. 561), shall, for the time being, be extended until the date of the hearing on the Motion to Stay Enforcement of Judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
