Rumantsev v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-02539-EFB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180711a20
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from July 11, 2018 to August 17, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from July 11, 2018 to August 17, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension...
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from July 11, 2018 to August 17, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel had a death of a family member and is attending prayer services in the next few weeks. In addition, Counsel has over 85+ pending social security cases, which require two or more dispositive motions a week until mid-August. Due to current workload demands and upcoming leave, Counsel needs additional time to adequately review the transcript and properly respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. Counsel apologizes for the belated request, but did not anticipate being out on the current filing deadline due to the unexpected death of a family member. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
