DealDash Oyj v. ContextLogic Inc., 3:18-cv-02353-MMC (JCS). (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190424932
Visitors: 22
Filed: Apr. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 23, 2019
Summary: [PROPOSED] [ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Defendant ContextLogic Inc. d/b/a Wish's ("Wish") Administrative Motion to File Under Seal ("Motion") was brought before this Court. Upon consideration of the Motion and the supporting Declaration of Marcus Peterson, the Court finds there to be good cause and compelling reasons to grant Defendants request to file certain documents under seal. GOOD CAUSE and compelling reasons having
Summary: [PROPOSED] [ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Defendant ContextLogic Inc. d/b/a Wish's ("Wish") Administrative Motion to File Under Seal ("Motion") was brought before this Court. Upon consideration of the Motion and the supporting Declaration of Marcus Peterson, the Court finds there to be good cause and compelling reasons to grant Defendants request to file certain documents under seal. GOOD CAUSE and compelling reasons having ..
More
[PROPOSED] [ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
Defendant ContextLogic Inc. d/b/a Wish's ("Wish") Administrative Motion to File Under Seal ("Motion") was brought before this Court. Upon consideration of the Motion and the supporting Declaration of Marcus Peterson, the Court finds there to be good cause and compelling reasons to grant Defendants request to file certain documents under seal.
GOOD CAUSE and compelling reasons having been shown, the Court finds that:
1. The designating parties possess overriding confidentiality interests that overcome the right of public access to the record of the following documents:
Document Portions Sought to be Sealed
Exhibit B to Declaration of Marcus Peterson in • Entire Document
support of Defendant's Objections to
Magistrate Judge Spero's Order Denying
Motion to Compel
Exhibit C to Declaration of Marcus Peterson in • Entire Document
support of Defendant's Objections to
Magistrate Judge Spero's Order Denying
Motion to Compel
2. The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and
3. No less restrictive means exist to achieve this overriding interest.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Administrative Motion for Leave to File Under Seal is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
