Martinez. v. City of West Sacramento, 2:16-CV-02566-TLN-EFB. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191104b94
Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 01, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANT DANIEL T. ZWICKY'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' SECOND TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . STIPULATION AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendant Daniel T. Zwicky, and subject to Court approval, that Defendant Zwicky shall file his response to the Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 116) on or before December 9, 2019, and agrees to accommodate Plaintiffs' counsel's schedule such that no oppositions are due the within seven
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANT DANIEL T. ZWICKY'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' SECOND TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . STIPULATION AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendant Daniel T. Zwicky, and subject to Court approval, that Defendant Zwicky shall file his response to the Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 116) on or before December 9, 2019, and agrees to accommodate Plaintiffs' counsel's schedule such that no oppositions are due the within seven d..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANT DANIEL T. ZWICKY'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' SECOND
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
STIPULATION AND ORDER
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendant Daniel T. Zwicky, and subject to Court approval, that Defendant Zwicky shall file his response to the Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 116) on or before December 9, 2019, and agrees to accommodate Plaintiffs' counsel's schedule such that no oppositions are due the within seven days on either side of Christmas and Plaintiffs will have at least two weeks between due dates for opposing any motions to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
