Woods v. Carey, 2:04-cv-1225 MCE AC P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190403c64
Visitors: 1
Filed: Apr. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff has filed objections to the order directing the court to disburse the settlement proceeds of $5,000.00 principle, plus any accrued interest, to Ms. McKinney. ECF No. 402. He asserts that there are two payments at issue and that "the court has refused to address the $1,000.00 principle, plus any accrued interest" that was awarded to him by the jury in 2009. Id. However, the terms of the settlement agreement explicitly state that the $5,00
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff has filed objections to the order directing the court to disburse the settlement proceeds of $5,000.00 principle, plus any accrued interest, to Ms. McKinney. ECF No. 402. He asserts that there are two payments at issue and that "the court has refused to address the $1,000.00 principle, plus any accrued interest" that was awarded to him by the jury in 2009. Id. However, the terms of the settlement agreement explicitly state that the $5,000..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff has filed objections to the order directing the court to disburse the settlement proceeds of $5,000.00 principle, plus any accrued interest, to Ms. McKinney. ECF No. 402. He asserts that there are two payments at issue and that "the court has refused to address the $1,000.00 principle, plus any accrued interest" that was awarded to him by the jury in 2009. Id. However, the terms of the settlement agreement explicitly state that the $5,000.00 settlement amount also satisfied the damages awarded by the jury. ECF No. 353-1 at 3. Plaintiff is therefore incorrect that there should be a second payment. This case is closed and any further filings will be disregarded.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
